Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Harriet Miers?

  1. #1
    Inactive Member Pez23's Avatar
    Join Date
    February 29th, 2004
    Posts
    184
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Harriet Miers?

    she withdrew her nomination to the Supreme Court on Thursday after 3 weeks of brutal criticism
    ?Keep swinging! Whether I was in a slump or feeling badly or having trouble off the field, the only thing to do was keep swinging.? Hank Aaron

  2. #2
    Inactive Member greencrest1272's Avatar
    Join Date
    November 17th, 2004
    Posts
    1,846
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Harriet Miers?

    Probably for the best.
    It is hard to fail, but it is worse never to have tried to succeed.

    -Teddy Roosevelt

  3. #3
    Inactive Member pvhoo's Avatar
    Join Date
    October 26th, 2005
    Posts
    63
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    but, but, but.....

    The GOP engages in a level of double speak that absolutely appalls me. Their rhetoric through the whole Roberts situation was to, "guarantee each nominee an up or down vote." My how things change when the administration chooses to select someone that isn't a staunch, right-wing ideologue. Please pass the tact.....

  4. #4
    Inactive Member smarty's Avatar
    Join Date
    October 13th, 2003
    Posts
    1,264
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Harriet Miers?

    Actually it's in her best interest for both parties.. she wasn't well received by Republicans or Democrats. She has no record plus she's too conservative esp. with her stance on pro-life.. she is suppose to be replacing a "swing vote" judge who who upheld pro-choice in Roe V. Wade.

  5. #5
    Inactive Member pvhoo's Avatar
    Join Date
    October 26th, 2005
    Posts
    63
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    she's fairly moderate in comparison

    to other prospective nominees. Conservatives view this as their chance to pack the court for the next 20 years. She wasnt the best choice, but she's no roberts when it comes to the belief in conservative ideology. Liberals, in fact, didn't oppose this nomination with as much vigor as they might have, and I think that a lack of reaction by democrats is an indication that she isn't as conservative as right-wing ideologues want in a new supreme. Indeed she has few qualifications and a short resume, but I fear that the alternative could be much worse. I understand that she's not the progressive nominee liberals would want, but she's the most moderate choice that this president would consider.

  6. #6
    Inactive Member gcdevil22's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 11th, 2004
    Posts
    5,129
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: she's fairly moderate in comparison

    i think the democrats just knew she would never get passed
    "An individual has not started living until he can rise above the narrow confines of his individualistic concerns to the broader concerns of all humanity."

    -Martin Luther King Jr.

  7. #7
    Inactive Member greencrest1272's Avatar
    Join Date
    November 17th, 2004
    Posts
    1,846
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: she's fairly moderate in comparison

    I just had an issue with her not having any experience as a judge.
    It is hard to fail, but it is worse never to have tried to succeed.

    -Teddy Roosevelt

  8. #8
    Inactive Member pvhoo's Avatar
    Join Date
    October 26th, 2005
    Posts
    63
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    true enough....

    That's a fair point. The Dems probably felt that much opposition wasnt necessary. It does annoy me that conservatives nearly enact the nuclear option in eliminating the filabuster in order to get roberts in. They wanted an up or down vote for every nominee, but now it doesnt seem necessary. They change their policies for the sake of convenience.

  9. #9
    Inactive Member gcdevil22's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 11th, 2004
    Posts
    5,129
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: true enough....

    it is pretty funny when the shoe is on the other foot [img]/LDPforum/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
    "An individual has not started living until he can rise above the narrow confines of his individualistic concerns to the broader concerns of all humanity."

    -Martin Luther King Jr.

  10. #10
    Inactive Member greencrest1272's Avatar
    Join Date
    November 17th, 2004
    Posts
    1,846
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: true enough....

    If you can do it why not??? [img]/LDPforum/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
    It is hard to fail, but it is worse never to have tried to succeed.

    -Teddy Roosevelt

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •